GSIS

Is The Carmack Amendment Relevant In International Shipments?

International shipments are common in today’s global market with the result that it has become common for product shipment to cross borders to reach the consumer.  The distance and necessity for using different modes of transportation can lead to an increased risk for damaging accidents.

The Carmack Amendment provide a well-established procedure for handling such incidents that happen on interstate trucking shipments in the United States.  However, when an accident occurs in the domestic portion of an international shipment the applicability of the Carmack Amendment is a work in progress.

Currently the Carmack Amendment provides a  standardized national scheme of liability and damages for interstate rail and motor carriers in order to give certainty to both shippers and carriers.  One objective of the amendment is to relieve cargo owners of the onus of discovering which is the offending carrier among what is often a myriad of carriers involved in the interstate shipment of goods.

What is at question is whether the Carmack Amendment applies to multi-transit domestic segments of an international shipment which is covered by one contract such as a bill lading.

In a recent court case, Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd versus Regal-Beloit Corporation, the Supreme Court ruled that the Carmack Amendment does not apply to the domestic portion of a shipment that originated overseas under a single bill of lading.  Under the Carmack rules only the receiving carrier is required to issue a Carmack compliant bill of lading.  The receiving carrier as defined by Carmack is only the carrier who accepts the shipment at its point of origin. In the Kawasaki case the carrier, Kawaski received the cargo under a through bill of lading that covered the shipment to an inland location in the US and there was no rail carrier who was required to issue a bill of lading under Carmack. 

This Supreme Court decision thus limited Carmack application in international shipments.  However,  it left to open whether the Carmack Amendment applies when the goods intended for export are received in the US and whether it applies in instances involving a freight forwarder or other intermediaries.

More recent lower court rulings appear to expand the direction of the Kawasaki  Court Case with their conclusions that other bodies of law or contracts apply in the domestic portion of international shipments.  This trend of limiting application of the Carmack Amendment in the domestic portion of the international shipment provides strategies for carriers to avoid Carmack liability when drawing up contracts and in litigation.